C-FITAQP: 7b) TERRAIN COLLISION – AUTOMATION

Epic E1000 | N98FK

Steamboat Springs, Colorado

  • DTSB analysis published
Share a tip about this accident

Key facts

  • DateFebruary 13, 2026
  • Local time12:20 AM
  • LightNight
  • WeatherIMC
  • Phase of flightApproach
  • People on board4
  • Fatalities4
  • AirportKSBS
  • NTSB numberCEN26FA115
  • NTSB statusUnder investigation

Accident Location

City, State
Steamboat Springs, Colorado
Latitude
40.461942
Longitude
-106.849
Airport ID
KSBS

Aircraft Info

N Number
N98FK
Make
Epic
Model
E1000
Category / Class
Aircraft Single Engine Land
Amateur Built
No

Pilot Info

Pilot in command
Stokes, Aaron
Gender
Male
Age
47
Certification
Commercial Pilot
IFR rating
Yes
Medical
1st Class Medical
Flight school
No
Instructional flight
No

Analysis

Weather
IMC
Time of day
Night
Phase of flight
Approach
Pilot error
Yes
Pilot incapacitation
No
People on board
4
PIC fatality
1
Passenger fatalities
3
Total fatalities
4
NTSB number
CEN26FA115
NTSB travel
Yes

Probable Cause

THE DTSB

The DTSB determines the Probable Cause of this accident to be pilot error, in that the accident pilot elected to fly a night IMC approach into an area of known terrain, intending to land after midnight local time. The accident pilot requested the RNAV(GPS) Z RWY 32 approach and was cleared to fly the approach, with circle to land on runway 14. This approach was NA for night straight in and was also NA for night circle to runway 32. The accident pilot properly selected the approach and allowed the on board automation to fly both lateral and vertical guidance, thereby disregarding critical MDA constraint of 9100 feet at WDCHK intersection, as the on-board GARMIN system recognized the “Advisory Glideslope” data and followed that. The aircraft was travelling more than 180 KIAS and the on-board automation pitched the aircraft nose down in order to maintain the Garmin generated, non approved, advisory glideslope, thereby resulting in a vertical descent rate in excess of 1200 FPM. The accident pilot set 13,600 in his altitude window while descending, in anticipation of a possible missed approach, but in doing so, eliminated the hard level off required at WDCHK of 9100 feet. The aircraft tracked the lateral GPS course within a few feet, and the accident pilot monitored the vertical path by prioritizing the advisory glideslope over the published altitude constraint at WDCHK. The airport winds were from the southeast, so the accident pilot was issued a proper IFR approach clearance for this approach, with circle to land on 14. The aircraft would have received numerous nuisance terrain warnings as is common on these type approaches, and the accident pilot likely simply disregarded them all, as his confidence lay in the published FAA procedure, and the Garmin automation. The aircraft impacted at high speed and high ROD on the southeast side of the terrain ridge in solid IMC conditions, the accident pilot never aware of the danger that he was in.

NTSB

None yet (final report not yet published).

Recommendation

THE DTSB

The DTSB recommends that all pilots of all aircraft rehearse and condition themselves to monitor all paths while in IMC conditions, and to manually assure that all altitude constraints are honored regardless of auxiliary non approved glideslope indications. There are instances where a pilot can push one button, and watch the automation fly the aircraft safely down to the runway. This was not one of them.

Resources